COOPERATOREVENTS NEW YORK EXPO. TUESDAY NOV 19TH . JAVITS CONVENTION CENTER. REGISTER NOW!

Q&A: Unexplained Maintenance Increases

Q&A: Unexplained Maintenance Increases
Q I’ve lived in my Manhattan co-op for nearly 20 years. We elected a new board  president a little over a year ago, and in that short time our board has raised  the monthly maintenance three times. Can a board just keep raising our  maintenance without consulting shareholders? What protects us as shareholders?  Shouldn’t the shareholder be given a certain amount of time and prior notice before  implementing these increases?  

 — Manhattan Shareholder  

A “In most cooperatives, the board of directors is authorized to set and increase,  from time-to-time, maintenance charges which in its sole judgment are necessary  to meet the corporation’s cash requirements and to fund reserves,” states attorney Stanley M. Kaufman of the Manhattan-based law firm of Kaufman  Friedman Plotnicki & Grun, LLP. However, the first thing that you should do is review your co-op’s bylaws and proprietary lease because proprietary leases vary, and some contain  limitations on a board’s right to increase maintenance charges, add services or fund reserves resulting  in an increase in maintenance beyond a certain percentage. We represent one co-op whose lease contains an express limitation upon the board’s power to significantly change or add new services if doing so will result in a  substantial maintenance increase.  

 “Typically, however, the board’s right to establish the co-op’s annual cash requirements and set maintenance levels is a matter within the  realm of the board’s business judgment. As long as the board is acting for proper corporate  purposes, in accordance with any lease or bylaw requirements, and not in bad  faith, its decision cannot be successfully challenged.  

 “It also should be noted that in creating a balanced budget, only a small  percentage of the co-op’s expenses are discretionary. The bulk of the budget usually consists of  expenses that are largely beyond the board’s control (and often increasing), such as mortgage interest, labor costs, taxes  and utilities. If you believe that your co-op president and current board are reckless  spenders, of course, you have the power of the ballot. At your next annual  meeting, you can try to vote the rascals out. In addition, as a shareholder,  you have certain statutory rights (and probably rights under the proprietary  lease) to inspect certain of the corporation’s financial records.  

 “In answer to your second question regarding notice of maintenance increases,  unless the your proprietary lease or bylaws contains such a notice requirement,  which would be unusual, there is nothing in the law that requires any kind of  notice or warning to shareholders before maintenance is increased.”       

Related Articles

Road sign to foreclosure

Q&A: Tenant Obligations in Foreclosure

Q&A: Tenant Obligations in Foreclosure

Online voting. E-voting, election internet service, online choice. Ballot box with blank on laptop screen. Voting ballot on the phone screen. Isometry illustration with people scene for web graphic.

Q&A: Independent Board Election Review?

Q&A: Independent Board Election Review?

Man hole cover for sewer entry with iron grate on street in a city

Q&A: Whose (Sewer) Line is It?

Q&A: Whose Line is It?

 

3 Comments

  • What Are maintenance increases supposed to be on # of shares or current maintenance with a previous fuel assessment?
  • In our (pre Martin 21 Act ) walk-up COOP of 1918 the number of shares for each apartment were distributed not in accordance to the footage, location, floor of walk-up and etc. Each of 10 one-bedroom apartment has 24 shares and all 5 two-bedrooms has 38 shares. Instead of correct shares distribution, our maintenance fee reflected all those conditions. For 104 years our building operated that way with maintenance increases being prorated accordingly to current maintenance of each apartment. Now, the shareholders of lower floors of walk-up want to change structure of maintenance calculation, they want each of three lines of our building to average their maintenance. Therefore , they want to decrease the maintenance of the most valuable first and second floor apartments of our walk-up building on expense of increasing the maintenance of apartments of forth and fifth floors. All arguments about unfairness' of that change were dismissed, people voted in majority. Can you help us please?
  • In our (pre Martin 21 Act ) walk-up COOP of 1918 the number of shares for each apartment were distributed not in accordance to the footage, location, floor of walk-up and etc. Each of 10 one-bedroom apartment has 24 shares and all 5 two-bedrooms has 38 shares. Instead of correct shares distribution, our maintenance fee reflected all those conditions. For 104 years our building operated that way with maintenance increases being prorated accordingly to current maintenance of each apartment. Now, the shareholders of lower floors of walk-up want to change structure of maintenance calculation, they want each of three lines of our building to average their maintenance. Therefore , they want to decrease the maintenance of the most valuable first and second floor apartments of our walk-up building on expense of increasing the maintenance of apartments of forth and fifth floors. All arguments about unfairness' of that change were dismissed, people voted in majority. Can you help us please?