—Curious Significant Other
“Absent a legally recognized relationship, such as marriage, and absent the boyfriend being named on the shares, the writer's boyfriend has no property interest in the shares that could be enforced upon a break up of the relationship. He, therefore, could not compel a sale of the shares or a transfer of the proprietary lease if the couple breaks up.”
“In addition, while the boyfriend's occupancy was noted on the mortgage application, unless he is a co-obligor on the note, the lending institution did not rely on his credit in extending the loan.”
“Therefore, his absence from the apartment cannot be used by the bank as a basis to declare the loan in default and force a sale. In conclusion, if the pair breaks up, assuming no written agreement exists between the two dealing with their respective rights and obligations in such a situation, the writer could not be compelled to sell the apartment.”
Leave a Comment