COOPERATOREVENTS NEW YORK EXPO. TUESDAY MARCH 4TH . NEW YORK HILTON MIDTOWN. REGISTER NOW!

Big Changes for Co-ops Leaving HDFC Program Benefits, Restrictions, & Unsold Shares

Neighborhood development RGB color icon. Suburban community union. Financial contribution to residential housing. Affordable home and apartment. Buy mansion with loan. Isolated vector illustration

Way back in 1966, New York State established the Housing Development Finance Corporation (HDFC) as part of its efforts to provide affordable housing to residents of the state. The program has been very successful, providing over 100,000 affordable residences, many of them here in New York City.  In recent years however, an increasing number of HDFC properties, particularly co-ops, are choosing to leave the program and become market rate buildings. What happens when that happens?

HDFC co-ops are governed by what is known as a regulatory agreement. The agreement is essentially a loan security agreement (much like a mortgage) that expires when the debt attached to it is paid in full. “Once a building in the HDFC program has repaid its debt, it is released from its obligations under the agreement, like any other borrower,” says Hal Coopersmith, a principal of the NYC-based law firm Coopersmith & Coopersmith. “However, an HDFC may continue to have other obligations unique to HDFCs under its certificate of incorporation or other regulatory schema.”


Regulatory Agreements 


Coopersmith explains that an HDFC is incorporated under the New York State Business Corporation Law and Article XI of the New York State Private Housing Finance Law. The NYC Department of Housing Preservation and Development (HPD) finances the development of the cooperative apartment building that’s owned by the HDFC, subject to a regulatory agreement between the HPD and the HDFC, which includes certain restrictions on income, resale, and subletting. Like most security agreements, the term of the HPD regulatory agreement is typically 30 years. During that 30-year period, the HDFC must comply with all terms of the regulatory agreement and applicable provisions of the Private Housing Finance Law.

Upon the expiration of the term of the regulatory agreement, many such obligations also expire. Coopersmith elaborates: “For example, the HDFC will remain responsible for any obligations of its certificate of incorporation during the lifetime of said HDFC - such as its obligations to provide affordable housing, for example - as well as any general laws regulating cooperative corporations, but will no longer be required to share any profits and revenues with the HPD that may have been required under the regulatory agreement.”

In many ways, HDFCs function like any other cooperative corporation. They have a board of directors elected by the shareholders; they are governed by corporate bylaws, and each shareholder receives a stock certificate and proprietary lease evidencing their ownership in the corporation. Both before and after any regulatory agreement, an HDFC is likely to have a board application process, as well as transfer taxes - often called flip taxes - imposed on sellers similar to other cooperative corporations.

“However,” says Coopersmith, “an HDFC may be subject to other laws that impose both restrictions and benefits on the corporation and its shareholders. For example, Section 11-2106 of the New York City Tax Code exempts shares of a cooperative corporation which is subject to an HPD regulatory agreement from the payment of New York City transfer taxes. However, once the agreement expires, so does the exemption, and shareholders will become liable for the payment of transfer taxes upon the sale of their apartments.


Potential Changes to Note


One of the main changes to previous conventions can and will affect the sale of unsold shares in particular. “When an apartment building is converted from a rental building to a cooperative corporation under an HPD development plan,” notes Coopersmith, “there may be unsold shares at the time of the closing.” 

Unsold shares typically refer to any shares allocated either to apartments occupied by rental tenants who opted not to purchase under the offering plan, or to apartments that are unoccupied at the time the offering plan is declared effective. “The issuance of unsold shares by the HDFC at a later date is generally governed by the bylaws and proprietary lease,” says Coopersmith. 

During the term of any applicable regulatory agreement, the corporation may be subject to additional resale restrictions. Tenants who occupy the apartments, regardless of any regulatory agreement, may also be entitled to certain rights under the offering plan, rent stabilization laws, and other landlord/tenant and affordable housing regulations. After the termination, those rights may very well change or disappear, changing the picture dramatically for those seeking to sell their apartments under free market conditions.

Related Articles

Affordable Housing Crisis newspaper headline and magnifying glass

Executive Council for Housing Affordability Urges Congress to Act

Bipartisan Action Needed "to Address Affordability Crisis"

Report: NY Metro Ranks 3rd in Affordable Housing Investment

Report: NY Metro Ranks 3rd in Affordable Housing Investment

Homeownership Remains out of Reach for Many Americans

Study: NY Metro Mortgage Payments Up 53.1% Since 2022

Study: NY Metro Mortgage Payments Up 53.1% Since 2022

Monthly Payments Average $3,302

A hand presents an eviction notice isolated in flat design style (cut out)

Q&A: Co-op Tenant Evicted

Q&A: Co-op Tenant Evicted

Background check for employment or hiring, work experience or career history concept, criminal or drug check on candidate or employee, businessman with magnifying glass checking candidate documents.

Q&A: Mitchell-Lama Unit Rules

Q&A: Mitchell-Lama Unit Rules

NY-NJ Metro Area 12th Highest in the Nation for Property Taxes

NY-NJ Metro Area 12th Highest in the Nation for Property Taxes

Short Supply + High Values = Tough Going for Homebuyers

 

2 Comments

  • Aren't they leaving the program because their tax breaks are expiring? I heard the city wanted to impose new resale restrictions and perhaps a lot of owners are opting to cash out rather than accept those restrictions? In any case, you don't do much reporting on this question of why so many are leaving the program.
  • As typical with all such stories, the author's very broad comments and assumptions about the HDFC state of affairs do little to understand the real issues at hand. The PHFL (Private Housing Finance Law) was written for "new construction/developments" (with federal funds) and NOT meant to contemplate the transfer of in-rem buildings that fell into the City's hands in the 70s, to private hands (to tenants, mutual housing organizations, private developers). Because that law was already on the books, so to speak, the City used the PHFL to off-load more than 2000 buildings that fell into their hand due do RE tax defaults. The City's main concern in creating HDFCs, then, was to rid itself of that burden. Affordability was less a concern, as the City cannot even articulate TODAY what that means, let along what that meant in the 1980s. Affordable to whom? (i.e. the law states that housing is to remain "low income" but that is preposterous as anyone who runs a coop in NYC knows, and just goes to show that HDFCs of the 70', 80s and 90s was a round peg situation that didn't quite fit the PHFL's square hole of a law) While it is true that most HDFCs now exist outside of their initial regulatory/mortgage agreement, along with the expiration of the DAMP tax exemption (a partial and significant reduction in their RE tax, putting a cap on a building's assessment, as opposed to a reduction off the top) the STATUS and choices for HDFC board of directors are becoming more and more acute: do HDFC stay HDFCs, do they remain "affordable" or do they become "market rate" coops and benefit from market rate RE tax abatements? Moreover, what can be done now, to sustain and support one of NYC's most successful housing stories? There is a new state law that was just recently introduced by State Senator Robert Jackson and Assembly Member Al Taylor which 1) clarify the HDFC status and choices, 2) incentivizes HDFC to stay affordable by expanding and making permanent the RE tax exemption for ALL HDFCs, and 3) provide technical and professional assistance for distress HDFCs (and NOT onerous regulatory agreements) as well as provide RE tax relief for the most severely distress HDFCs with City oversight. That NYS bill for this legislative session is S880. If you read it, especially its preamble, one will get a pretty good sense of HDFC history, current situation and how the law proposed to address HDFC shareholder/homeowner's concerns for its future.