Page 17 - NY Cooperator November 2019
P. 17

COOPERATOR.COM  THE COOPERATOR —  NOVEMBER 2019      17  Cesarano & Khan, PC  Certified Public Accountants  PROVIDING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO   THE COOPERATIVE AND CONDOMINIUM COMMUNITY  Reporting on Financial Statements •  Tax Services  Budgeting & Consulting • Election Tabulation Services  For additional information, contact  Carl M. Cesarano, CPA  199 JERICHO TURNPIKE, SUITE 400 • FLORAL PARK, NY 11001  (516) 437-8200  and   718-478-7400 • info@ck-cpas.com  cesarano &khan1_8 use this_:cesarano &khan 4  7/22/15  4:59 PM  Page 1  Disclaimer: The answers provided in this Q&A   column are of a general nature and cannot   substitute for professional advice regarding your   specific circumstances. Always seek the advice of   competent legal counsel or other qualified profes-  sionals with any questions you may have regard-  ing technical or legal issues.  tags under $1 million. The complex also in-  cludes 320 rentals, and has a 25,000 square   foot “private park,” a rooftop pool with ca-  banas, private wine rooms, and a coworking   lounge.   Ditmas Park welcomes a condo building   at 1702 Newkirk Ave. to its stately neigh-  borhood of Brooklyn Victorians. Two of   the 12 condos are for sale; one of them is   a two-bedroom with two balconies, floor-  to-ceiling windows, and a large dining area,   listed at $799,000. The building amenities   also include private storage rooms, a bike   room, a gym, and a roof deck with grills.   A new “passive house” at 852 St. John’s   Place in Crown Heights is an eco-friendly   condo building  with five  units, all priced   under $1 million. The building’s insulation,   airtight envelope, and triple-glazed win-  dows virtually eliminate heat and air-con-  ditioning needs, reducing costs and carbon   emissions for owners.   The Rowan, a 46-unit condo building in   Astoria set for completion in 2020 will soon   launch  sales,  starting  at  $495,000.  Studio   to three-bedroom units  with wide-plank   white oak floors, oversized windows, and   Miele appliances range in size from 425 to   1,857 square feet. The building is flush with   amenities,  including  a  gym,  and  indoor/  outdoor lounge, a soundproof music prac-  tice room, a pet spa, and a landscaped roof   deck with Manhattan views.   In Bed-Stuy, Brooklyn, 82 one- and two-  bedroom units priced from $630,000 to   $950,000 will sit across the street from each   other at 175 and 192 Spencer. Residents in   the two buildings will enjoy covered park-  ing and a gym along with their hardwood   floors, exposed concrete ceilings, and Bosch   kitchen appliances.  A new condo being built at 567 Ocean   in Flatbush, Brooklyn, will have 108 units,   95 of which will be priced below $1 mil-  lion when sales launch in November. Start-  ing around $400,000, the studios through   three-bedrooms with have hardwood floors   and Bosch appliances, along with access to   to call a special shareholders’ meeting to elect   a new board. Prior to the meeting, the reader   should confirm with neighbors who will be   running to replace the sitting board mem-  bers’ seats. A quorum in accordance with the   bylaws is necessary to proceed with the elec-  tion, and thus proxies should be gathered in   advance to ensure the desired candidates are  er with a legal parking spot in the building’s   elected.  “The top priorities of the new board  caregivers. She is unable to walk securely to   should be hiring an independent accoun-  tant to conduct an audit of the co-op’s re-  cords and accounts and paying off any un-  paid property taxes to avoid a tax lien filing  rage so my sisters can park in my garage spot   against the property.”  Staff Holiday Fund Tax Implications  Q  For more than 30 years, my con-  dominium building has had a res-  ident-managed fund that collects   cash gifts for the staff at holiday time. This   has worked very well and was always 100   percent independent of  the  condominium   board and the management firm, with no   members of the board ever involved with the   fund while they were serving on the board.  This past year, for the first time three   members of the board were listed on the   notices as members of the committee that   handles the collection of contributions and   distribution of the money to the staff. (This   year  more than $50,000  was  collected  and   distributed to the employees.)  My understanding was always that board   members could not have anything to do   with this process, as they are designated as   the ‘employers’ and their involvement would   trigger  the  need for the  condominium to   handle the payments with appropriate with-  holdings  and  the  condominium  paying  its   share of FICA.  Is that accurate, or is it legal for the board   members to be involved in such a process   that distributes this large amount of funds to   the staff? Does their involvement create po-  tential IRS violations?                                 —Protecting the Gifts  A  According to attorney Aaron   Shmulewitz of the Manhat-  tan firm of Belkin Burden   Wenig & Goldman, LLP, “In New York State,   condominium boards are vested with very   broad authority to manage their buildings as   they deem most appropriate, subject to vari-  ous restrictions imposed by law. While this   condominium’s bylaws would need to be re-  viewed to confirm the specific answer here,   generally speaking, creating and populating   committees and deciding on holiday com-  pensation  to  staff  fall  squarely within  the   board’s authority. There is no legal prohibi-  tion on board members serving on a com-  mittee that decides holiday compensation   for staff, and doing so does not create any   additional legal liability for the condomini-  um. Tax obligations with regard to any such   payments—both for the condominium and   for the staff members—would be the same   regardless of who is on the committee.”  Is My Co-op Ignoring ADA?  Q  My 88-year-old mother has just   moved into a co-op on Staten Is-  land where I am also a sharehold-  garage. My four sisters and I are her daily   any cars parked outside on the street due to   the fact that the building is on a very steep   hill. I have requested extra access to the ga-  while I am at work during the day. The board   and management company have denied this   request and stated if anyone parked in my   spot—even family members— the car would   be towed.  I have also requested extra access keys   to the front door for my sisters in case of   an emergency where my mother would be   unable to use the intercom system to allow   them entry to the building. I was granted   one extra key.  I also questioned management on how   9-1-1 emergency response would access the   building if required, as my mother does wear   a medical alert system. No reply has been ob-  tained as of today.  Please advise if ADA reasonable accom-  modations apply to my requests under these   scenarios and if I should continue to pursue   my requests?                           —Care-Giving Daughter  A  “Based upon these facts,” says   attorney Bruce Cholst of An-  derson Kill, a Manhattan law   firm, “I believe your mother is absolutely en-  titled to a reasonable accommodation by rea-  son of her disability (mobility impairment)   under Federal, New York State, and New   York City law. The accommodation would be   in the nature of granting each of your sisters   access to your parking space during working   hours while you are not using it so they can   more easily provide essential caretaking ser-  vices for your immobile mother.  “What may be giving your board some   pause is that this is not a direct accommoda-  tion to your mother, the disabled sharehold-  er, but rather an accommodation flowing to   your sisters, to whom they owe no duty as a   shareholder. However, the law states that dis-  abled shareholders must be accommodated   in such a manner as they are put on equal   footing with their non-disabled neighbors   so long as the request does not inflict ‘un-  due hardship’ on the community. Here your   mother is unable to greet her caretakers on   the street the way her non-disabled neigh-  bors are, and the request does not impose   undue hardship as the subject parking space   is otherwise vacant during the times when   your sisters are using it. The same reasoning   continued on page 18   Q&A  continued from page 5  applies to the issuance of extra keys.  “I would suggest approaching the board   again with these arguments as well as a med-  ical diagnosis as to your mother’s immobil-  ity. Do any of your sisters have mobility is-  sues as well? I would suggest providing that   documentation as well if such be the case   as it establishes the difficulty of your sisters   obtaining access to your mother, further   demonstrating the disparity between your   mother and her non-disabled neighbors.  “If your board continues to refuse this ac-  commodation, you have two choices: Your   mother may commence a lawsuit in State   Supreme Court or in Federal Court on the   basis of illegal disability discrimination, or   she may file a complaint with the New York   City Commission on Human Rights or its   New York State counterpart and they will   undertake an administrative investigation   and pursue the matter with the cooperative.   I suggest the latter course and, in particular,   filing with the New York City Commission   as they will pursue the matter most aggres-  sively free of charge if they believe there is a   case.”   n  PULSE  continued from page 4  Our attorney   advisors have   the answers to all of your   legal questions. Write to   The   Cooperator   and we’ll publish   your question along with a   response from one of our attor-  ney advisors. Questions may be   edited for taste, length, and clar-  ity. Send your questions to:    darcey@cooperator.com.  Q&A


































































































   15   16   17   18   19