Page 9 - New York Cooperator February 2019
P. 9

COOPERATOR.COM   THE COOPERATOR   — FEBRUARY 2019     9  ROSENWACH TANK  THE FIRST NAME IN QUALITY CEDAR WOOD TANKS  WE ARE CERTIFIED and IT MATTERS!  718.729.4900   43-02 Ditmars Boulevard, 2nd Fl., Astoria, NY 11105  www.rosenwachgroup.com  Rosenwach is proud to announce that Rosenwach’s tanks are certified to NSF/ANSI 61 by NSF   International, a leading global independent public health and safety organization. NSF/ANSI 61   addresses crucial aspects of drinking water system components such as whether contaminants   that leach or migrate from the product/material into the drinking water are below acceptable levels   in finished waters.  To receive certification, Rosenwach Tank submitted product samples to NSF that underwent rigorous   testing to recognized standards, and agreed to manufacturing facility audits and periodic retesting   to verify continued conformance to the standards.  The NSF mark is our customers’ assurance that our prod-  uct has been tested by one of the most respected indepen-  dent certification organizations. Only products bearing the   NSF mark are certified.  where you live, it’s important to note that   impersonal methods of outreach – like   email – should not be a substitute for   actually interacting with constituents in   person.   “Email should not be used to eliminate   or  avoid  discussion  at  board  meetings,”   warns Allison L. Hertz, a senior associ-  ate with Kaye Bender Rembaum, a law   firm that has offices in Pompano Beach   and Palm Beach Gardens, Florida. “In   most circumstances, board meetings are   required to be open to members \\\[so\\\] the   members of the association are able to   hear how the board makes its decisions.  “That said,” she continues, “meeting   minutes should be minutes. They should   not be a transcription of the entire meet-  ing. Such a document could be used   against the association and could result   in association liability.”  Even  when  withholding  some  infor-  mation from unit owners seems like the   prudent thing to do, a board should still   consider how owners may react to the   basic idea of being left out of the loop.   Moriarty recalls one instance in the mid-  dle of a construction defect litigation:   “A group of unit owners were demand-  ing the release of the board’s expert en-  gineering report. On advice of counsel,   and to preserve privilege, the report –   which had been prepared in anticipation   of litigation with the developer – was not   disclosed. The board didn’t withhold the   report to keep it from the owners; it was   withheld  to keep  it  from  the developer   and other defendants in the lawsuit. This   was a perfectly reasonable decision, and   it could have been easily communicated   to unit owners, but it was not. Because   of this, a group of unit owners actually   started to act against the interests of the   association  with  regard  to  the  report,   simply because they did not understand   the reason why the board was withhold-  ing it. This resulted in months of conflict,   acrimony, and cost.”  “Even fairly minor changes, like alter-  ing the hours of the laundry room, can   create  issues  for  some  residents,”  adds   Axinn. “Any change in policy should first  for the greater good. A board must know  board could not divulge to the unit own-  be fully disclosed in a memorandum to all  how to walk this delicate line.  the shareholders at least 30 days before it   goes into effect.”  The Perils of Oversharing  Of course, there is a point at which re-  vealing too much information to residents  not be conveyed,” says Moriarty. “For in-  can be detrimental (or just overwhelm-  ing), and as such it needs to be withheld  negotiating a landscaping contract, the   “In addition to instances where infor-  mation cannot be disclosed because of  gotiation would learn that information,   privilege or legal prohibition, there are  and all leverage would be lost. Similarly,   times when specific information can-  stance, if the board were in the middle of   ers its bottom-line contract price because   of the risk that the other party to the ne-  if the board were suing the developer for   construction defects, the board could not   “It’s essential to pay   attention to the details,   or there can be problems   in the future.”             — Mark Axinn  continued on page 20


































































































   7   8   9   10   11