Page 6 - New York Cooperator February 2020
P. 6

6 THE COOPERATOR —  FEBRUARY 2020   COOPERATOR.COM  Providing a Full Range of   Architectural & Engineering Services  In-house professional   expertise in:  Exterior Restoration &       Historic Preservation  Construction Inspection  Alteration Review  Architectural Design  Engineering:  n  Mechanica  l   n  Electrical  n  Plumbing  n  Structural  Energy Audits  Forensic Investigation  Façade Safety Inspection       Program Reporting  Green Design –       LEED Professionals  Client satisfaction    assured by the active   daily involvement of    the firm’s principals  www.lawlessmangione.com  info@lawlessmangione.com  914.423.8844  through kickback and bid-rigging schemes in  emergency situation, obtaining bids just isn’t   another residential real estate industry scan-  dal.   According to a Department of Investiga-  tion’s press release about the latter indict-  ments, “Bid-rigging and kickbacks have obvi-  ously been a way of life for many years in the  efi t from their longevity, where institutional   residential real estate industry. But...today’s  knowledge, personal comfort, and familiarity   coordinated response by local law enforce-  ment will go a long way toward ending this  weighs saving a few bucks by switching to a   cycle of greed.”  By all accounts, it has. While there are   undoubtedly still unscrupulous administra-  tors continuing to pocket money under the  he and other attorneys advise against add-  table from vendors, there is a common un-  derstanding  that  those  schemes  and  tactics  not simply “at the discretion of the board.”   are part of an unsavory past. Gruen herself is  While an organization might be tempted to   happy that bygone crackdowns have cleaned  add language around the bidding process to   up the industry, to the point that she almost  its documents in an eff ort to avoid confl icts   wishes there were more to come, because it  or the appearance of such, doing so could   would  make  reputable  businesses  like  hers  have the eff ect of gumming up the works,   smoother to operate.   Intensifi ed scrutiny from law enforce-  ment—and  from boards  and management  or contracts over a certain monetary thresh-  fi rms themselves—has led to a more ethical  old is an unnecessary muzzle on the board’s   and accountable industry all around, but a  judgment, and assumes prior cost estimation.   savvy board should still keep its eyes open,  Even more constraining, a clause that triggers   and not hesitate look closer if something  a shareholder or unit owner vote on projects   seems off . “Th  ere are no stupid questions,”  over a certain dollar amount would stymie the   Wagner reminds us. “Ask the question. Chal-  lenge authority. I’ve seen some crazy things  complicate confi dentiality.   that were picked up by board members who   just  didn’t  understand  and asked  the  ques-  tion.”   When You’re On Your Own  So far we’ve focused on the bidding process  and balances, and knowing when to ask ques-  when professional managers are involved. But  tions will go a long way toward keeping the   where do self-managed communities turn to  process fair and legal.                                          fi nd qualifi ed bidders, write an RFP, level bids,   and interface with potential vendors?   Given enough time, forethought, and   planning, a self-managed board can defi -  nitely get the job done. First, you already have   a  great  resource:   Th  e Cooperator!    Our  on-  line Directory of Co-op and Condo Services   (www.directory.cooperator.com) includes an   exhaustive list of relevant professionals cover-  ing everything from legal services to HVAC   repair.   But if your board simply doesn’t have the   time, or doubts its ability to navigate the pro-  cess itself, there are other options. One such   option is Th  e Bid Lab, a New York-based   consulting fi rm that focuses exclusively on   the RFP process on behalf of small and medi-  um-sized nonprofi t boards. Maurice Harary   started the company with his business partner   in 2017, drawing from a background in busi-  ness and procurement to put together a team   of experts to help boards in the quest for new   vendors, contracts, and services.   Bids, Adieu  All of this may beg the question: does ev-  ery contract or project need to be bid out?   According to Richard Brooks, a partner at   the law fi rm of Marcus, Errico, Emmer, &   Brooks in Braintree, Massachusetts, the short   answer is no – at least not legally speaking. He   says it’s really more an exercise in common   sense. Small jobs don’t merit taking the time   and eff ort to solicit multiple bids, and in an   practical. Brooks adds that when it comes to   longer-term contractual relationships like   with a manager or an attorney, “Th  ere’s no   reason to go out to bid unless things aren’t   going well.” In fact, those relationships ben-  with the property have value that likely out-  diff erent provider.   Governing documents are also pretty   much silent on bidding, says Brooks, and   ing provisions for obtaining bids that are   so to speak. For example, Brooks points out   that requiring a competitive bid for projects   board’s decision-making process  and could   Ultimately, the process of bidding out proj-  ects on behalf of a community is just another   part of a board’s duties to their consituents.   Understanding the basics, maintaining checks   n  Darcey Gerstein is an Associate Editor and   Staff  Writer for Th  e Cooperator.  BIDDING...  continued from page 2  you shouldn’t recommend him for roof re-  pairs to the building. In the more abstract   sense, Davidson points out that adherence   to this duty is less clearly defi ned in a co-op   or condo than it may be in other not-for-  profi t organizations, because in a residential   context, every board member presumably   owns a unit or shares and may make deci-  sions based on what may benefi t them but   not their neighbor.    “While co-op and condo boards repre-  sent nonprofi t corporations and associa-  tions, they are, at their core, somewhat dif-  ferent from non-residential nonprofi ts,” he   says, “because the board members are in-  vestors or owners in the nonprofi t and their   board positions carry a heavy fi duciary re-  sponsibility.” An example might be voting   to permit Airbnb rentals. Doing so might   provide a particular board member with   additional  income,  but their  neighbor(s)   might not want strangers in the building.   MANAGING...  continued from page 1


































































































   4   5   6   7   8