Page 33 - NY Cooperator October Expo 2019
P. 33

COOPERATOR.COM  THE COOPERATOR —  OCTOBER 2019     33  TANE WATERMAN & WURTZEL, P.C.  CO-OP/CONDO ATTORNEYS  There When You Need Us  Principals:  David A. Tane • Stewart E. Wurtzel • Andrew D. Stern • Leonard M. Khandros  Associates:  Moshe C. Bobker • Jacob R. Fleitman • Ruta Behrend • Adam Lazaros  Of Counsel: Marcie Waterman Murray Lawrence McGaughey  •  Provide legal counsel to  Cooperatives, Condominiums  and Individuals  Represent our clients’ interests  in all litigation in Federal,  State and City Courts  Transfer Agent Services  Landlord – Tenant  Purchase, Refinance  and Lease Transactions  Residential and  Commercial Sales  Corporate and  Business Law  120 Broadway • Suite 948 • New York, NY 10271-0040  Phone: (212) 766-4000 • Email: Swurtzel@tww.nyc  www.tww.nyc  TaneWaterman_NYCP_October19:TaneWaterman  9/12/2019  2:06 PM  Page 1  60 Cutter Mill Road, Suite 303   Great Neck, NY 11021  Phone: (516) 466-3100   www.MajesticPropertyMGT.com  Specializing in:  • Quality Management Services  •  In-House Expertise in Cooperative/Condo:     ›  Budgeting/Financial Planning, Taxes,   Insurance  • Cooperative/Condo Sales  •  “24/7” Emergency Answering Service  •  General Contracting and Supervision of   Capital Improvement Projects  M  ajestic  PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CORP.  A Leader in Property   Management for 30 Years  ior of children, responsibility ultimately   lies with the parents. “While an associa-  tion can restrict or prohibit play in com-  mon areas such as hallways, lobbies, stair-  wells, or elevators, age restriction most   likely  would  not  be  permissible  given   housing laws,” notes Chatt. “It should   be noted that some states – including Il-  linois  – do  permit communities to  elect   to restrict ownership to a certain age (Il-  linois sets that age at 55). In that instance,   children would not be permitted to reside   in a unit – and as a guest, their access to   certain areas can be restricted or regulat-  ed more closely. That said, just as an as-  sociation may restrict common areas for   ingress and egress, or prohibit storage of   bicycles or shoes, it may also prohibit play   activities in those areas as well.”   Einhorn urges boards to avoid ap-  proaching rules with an assumption that   a child left unsupervised will cause mis-  chief. “That is NOT a valid basis for re-  quiring supervision in common areas,” he   says. “If supervision in common areas – or   for certain amenities – is going to be re-  quired, then the reason should be rooted   in  safety. Fair housing  laws  protect the   rights of families to enjoy the same rights   to amenities as adults, and they should not   be subject to oppressive or unnecessary   constraints.”  “This begs the question of which ac-  tions are or are not overly oppressive for   a board to take,” Einhorn continues. “For   starters, any rule or regulation that targets   children specifically should be closely ex-  amined. A rule should not prohibit chil-  dren from playing, or prohibit their toys   in the common areas. The rule should be   more neutral and rationally based – which   does not mean \\\[catering to\\\] neighbors   who simply don’t want to hear children   playing. If recreational activity is unsafe in   a specific area, then prohibit recreational   activity for ALL individuals in that area,   instead of banning children or requiring   children to be supervised.”  And, as Chatt points out, this can ex-  tend to quiet hours, which can be broadly   applied to everyone in the community for   specific periods during the day, and can be   a good starting point at offering neighbors   the tranquility for which they are looking.  Ultimately, the accommodation of fam-  ilies with young children and the concerns   of child-free residents aren’t mutually ex-  clusive; it’s all about neighbors respecting   each other, and community administra-  tors respecting the law and enforcing rules   fairly and reasonably. And that’s good pol-  icy, whether you’re 4 or 84.    n  Mike Odenthal is a staff writer/reporter   with The Cooperator.  CO-OPS...  continued from page 15  you must turn over the documents within   30 days – and sometimes they’ll specify   who is responsible for the cost of doing so.  “In a hypothetical situation in which   documents were not backed up and were   then lost, depending on the contours of   the management agreement, this could   constitute negligence or a breach of con-  tract. We do see cases in which managers   didn’t keep records to the extent they were   supposed to, and that absolutely can lead   to breach of contract or negligence. At that   point, you can go to court to force them   to turn over information, but if they had   never kept it in the first place, you have   to recreate it. The condo documents will   be recorded at the registry, so you have   to go and pull those offline. You’ll know   what bank was used, so you’ll be able to   regain some financial records. But you’ll   have a lot of things still missing: general   ledgers for unit owners, vendor informa-  tion... There are many pieces you’d have to   put together, which would be really tough   for a new management company, and even   worse  for  an  association  attempting  to   self-manage.”  (Avoiding) Anger (via) Management  While keeping all this important pa-  perwork and documentation straight and   appropriately accessible may sound daunt-  ing to an inexperienced board, it should   be business as usual for an effective man-  ager. In fact, many management compa-  nies now use an array of mobile apps and   services to help streamline record-keeping   in a way that allows boards to access infor-  mation with a few simple clicks.  Robert Arnone, managing principal   with RCA Management  in New York City   and Bayonne, New Jersey discusses how   his firm navigates the digital landscape:  “Nothing really gets discarded now that   everything – any document we receive – is   electronic,” he says. “Let’s say that a build-  ing is buying supplies. Our maintenance   staff will take a photo of every invoice –   even if it’s only a $2 screw – and that in-  voice will get sent to us.   “The boards of  our associations all   have access to an online portal where all   of their documents – financials, vendor   contracts, legal documents, government   documents, insurance contracts, pend-  ing applications, newsletters, tax returns,   meeting minutes, you name it – are stored.   As soon as we upload the relevant docu-  ment to the portal, the board will get an   email telling them it’s available.   “Should a board decide to leave us for   another management company, or to self-  manage for whatever reason, we can just   download the documents to a thumb drive   and send that to the new company. But   you hope that never happens, but there’s   always a chance that someone will come   MAINTAINING...  continued from page 17  continued on page 34 


































































































   31   32   33   34   35