Page 15 - CooperatorNews March 2022
P. 15

COOPERATORNEWS.COM 
COOPERATORNEWS — 
MARCH 2022   
15  
munity Affairs (DCA) has assembled a list  
of required inspections that are meant to  
ensure the health, safety, and welfare of a  
community and its residents. These include  
smoke  and carbon monoxide  detector  
checks, looking for tripping hazards in and  
around units and in common areas, proper  
egress from units and buildings, electrical  
panel function, and more depending on the  
size and type of the building or community.  
She cautions that requirements can vary in  
different municipalities and regions, and  
advises every manager and board to go to  
the DCA website to confirm their specific  
checklist. 
Warga-Murray says that the DCA re- 
quires 100% of unit owners to comply.  
This is not only a scheduling challenge, but  
can also increase the costs of the inspec- 
tions if the DCA inspectors have to make  
multiple return trips to the property to  
visit every unit, she warns. “People tell you,  
‘I’m not available in the morning; well, I’m  
not available in the afternoon, and I’m not  
available on Mondays; I’m not available on  
Tuesdays.’ And then you have to try and get  
the inspector so that they’re not coming  
back more than three days, or four days, or  
a week, because then you’re talking about  
six or eight hours a day of paying for your  
manager to be there. And that’s going to be  
very expensive.”  
To mitigate these costs, Warga-Murray  
has two strategies: put the time, procedure,  
and expense of DCA inspections into the  
management contract up front; and estab- 
lish a resolution to impose fines on unit  
owners or shareholders if they can’t be  
available for inspections or refuse or delay  
compliance, thus incurring fines and pen- 
alties for the community. 
Warga-Murray continues, “For the most  
part,  preparing  in  advance  is  technically  
one of the most important aspects of this  
[type of inspection]. It’s important for the  
manager to also conduct pre-inspections  
in advance of the DCA visits so they know  
specifically what areas are going to be ad- 
dressed. What I have found is that if we  
know [what the potential violations are]  
in advance, and then obtain contracts [to  
correct  them],  when  the  DCA  inspector  
comes, there is no penalty; they see that  
we’re involved in making the corrections.”  
Bringing it All Together 
Since building inspections are a fact of  
life for property owners, it pays to be aware,  
be prepared, and have a plan. At the end of  
the day, completing an inspection and get- 
ting that sign-off—whether it comes with  
a sticker or not—means that the commu- 
nity is that much more protected from both  
burdensome penalties and potential catas- 
trophes. As the pros say: instead of looking  
at inspections in terms of their cost, look at  
them in terms of their value.  
n 
Darcey Gerstein is Associate Editor and a  
Staff Writer for CooperatorNews. 
go either way, depending on the building.  
In the case of his own building—a high- 
rise constructed in the early 1960s—the ma- 
terials used in construction were less than op- 
timal, though the builder wasn’t aware of any  
potential problem at the time. The structure  
was clad in what was then known as ‘light- 
weight’ concrete. “Lightweight concrete is a  
problem,” says Gaynor. “It continues to cure  
over time—which effectively means that it  
keeps shrinking. So the original ceilings in the  
building were eight feet high, but now they  
are seven feet and 11 inches. Also, the brick  
around the concrete doesn’t shrink, which  
causes the bricks to bulge. 
“There are two possible approaches to cor- 
recting the problem,” Gaynor continues.  “You  
can take out two or three levels of brick at re- 
lieving angles [to reduce the pressure caused  
by concrete shrinkage], put in smaller, softer  
brick, and then replace the grout with softer  
materials. It’s a very expensive, complicated  
job. The other option, which is what we de- 
cided to do, is to remove and replace ALL of  
the brick. It’s also very expensive—but that’s  
what the shareholders decided. Sadly, no reg- 
ular maintenance ‘fix’ could have avoided this  
problem.” 
For owners in more suburban wood- 
frame and clapboard-covered townhouse  
communities—like the ones that dot the sub- 
urban New England landscape, for example— 
the situation is different, says Ralph Noblin, a  
retired engineer and former owner of Noblin  
& Associates, a building engineering firm lo- 
cated near Boston. 
 “Condo owners often complain about the  
drab look their communities take on after a  
few years,” he says,  
“and want to repaint  
everything long be- 
fore they need to.  Of- 
ten, the dull, shaded  
areas [on their build- 
ings] are just the result  
of exterior mold and  
mildew—the 
paint 
underneath  is  fine.  
In  these  situations,  
we recommend pres- 
sure washing” to re- 
move the grime and  
restore the siding or  
other materials to their former attractiveness.  
Noblin notes that many architects—particu- 
larly historic preservationists—view pressure  
washing as too harsh for many basic building  
materials, but says that “the pressure washing  
process is much better these days, and gentler  
than it used to be. In the hands of the right  
contractor, it is very affordable and has little  
adverse effect, so more professionals are get- 
ting comfortable with it. It’s much less expen- 
sive than a new paint job covering an entire  
community, or replacing the clapboard with  
aluminum siding.” 
MAINTAINING... 
continued from page 1 
Other Façade Types 
Much of what may need maintenance, how  
often, and at what cost, is determined by what  
materials façades are constructed of. “Brick is  
pretty hardy stuff,” says Gaynor, “but alumi- 
num and glass age, especially if they are fac- 
ing the water.  Terra- 
cotta, limestone, and  
cast stone are softer  
than brick, but ulti- 
mately their needs  
rest on the individ- 
ual variety of stone.”  
Overall, he says there  
is little that can be  
done to ‘polish’ these  
buildings. 
“Grime 
is tough to remove.  
You basically have  
to wait for rain to re- 
move it,” and in the  
end, the effort may not be worth the cost. “If  
a building is kept up properly,” says Gaynor,  
“the wear and tear of urban grime isn’t enough  
to really affect curb appeal.” In other words, it  
kind of goes with the territory. 
And the territory today also includes the  
effects of climate change. Gaynor points out  
that  just  the  increase  in extreme weather  
events alone causes more and faster dete- 
rioration of building exteriors. “We even see  
dust and soot from the fires in California,” he  
points out. The added effects of water damage  
continued on page 16  
“The original  
ceilings in the  
building were eight  
feet high, but now  
they are seven feet  
and 11 inches.”  
        —Alan Gaynor
   13   14   15   16   17