Page 6 - CooperatorNews NY February 2022
P. 6

6 COOPERATORNEWS —  FEBRUARY 2022  COOPERATORNEWS.COM  “I recommend that owners learn about  through pipes in someone’s bedroom walls,   their responsibility versus the association’s  such projects have the potential to cause   responsibility. For instance, with windows  costly property damage claims if there’s a   and doors, you should know whether  leak mishap, either during construction or   you’re responsible for the hardware, glass,  afterward.   and  frame. When  it  comes  to plumbing,   knowing that while the portions of pipe that   serve other units may be the association’s  board demanding that someone come fix   responsibility to maintain and repair, all  a drippy faucet, as well as the owner who   the fixtures are the owners’ jurisdiction.”  embarks  on  a  full  bathroom  renovation   And, Colon adds, this isn’t just academic;  without so much as notifying the board—  “these are important, unique areas of  emerge in force when a rental building   repair that can have a financial impact on  converts to  cooperative  or  association   shareholders down the line.”    For managers of co-op and condo  to, because original owners are becoming   properties, this ‘tenant mentality’ is  extinct,” he says, but even so, “often,   one of the biggest hurdles in getting  owners who were renters in the property   resident owners and shareholders to  and then went with the conversion \\\[to   understand  exactly  what their rights and   responsibilities  are.  “Frankly, there should   be a class for first-time   buyers,”  says Wolf,   “because new owners   need to be educated.   They  don’t  think  they’re responsible  for   anything. They don’t   understand what  it   means to own their   home.”  Wolf points out   another issue: that of   new condo or co-op   owners assuming that   because they’re no   longer renters, they can do whatever they   please in and around their new home,   despite the fact that that home shares   walls, floors, and ceilings with other   people. “This problem is prevalent in New   England,” says Wolf. “As a tenant they had   rules, but as an owner, they don’t think   they should be limited by anything—they   don’t understand  that  they  can’t  just  do   whatever they want. But part of ownership   is realizing that the association has certain   rules and requirements, that those rules   apply to you, and you must abide by them.   Like no smoking, or rules about parking,   or how loud and during what time you can   play  music. In an HOA, you can’t just plant   whatever you’d like in front of your house.   Or in practical terms, say there was a fire   in your unit. Often the unit owner doesn’t   understand that they have to contact their   own insurance carrier. It doesn’t fall under   the condo association policy.”  Wollman agrees with Wolf. “We see   it all the time,” he says. “Usually with   renovations. The owner wants to redesign   their apartment—say they want to extend   the master bath into the bedroom, or   something similar. There are a myriad of   reasons why you can’t just do that. You can’t   place a new ‘wet’ space \\\[like a kitchen or   bath\\\] over a ‘dry’ space \\\[like a bedroom or   living area\\\] on the floor below.” In addition   to the nuisance caused by water rushing   According  to  Wollman,  both  challenges—the owner who emails the   ownership. “We see it less now than we used   become  owner/  shareholders\\\] still   view the board as   a  landlord. They   don’t like to spend   money to maintain   and upgrade the   building, so they   often take a band-  aid  approach to   making necessary   b ui ldin g-w ide   repairs.” Needless   to say, this kind of   penny-pinching   can lead to much   bigger problems—  and bigger costs—  down the road.    Condo vs. Co-op  As is the case in most instances, there   are some fine differences in how these   matters are treated in co-ops and condos.   With respect to building and mechanical   issues such as plumbing, repairs, etc.,   condo and co-op situations are very   similar, with exceptions occurring more as   a result of individual governing documents   than law or statute. The main area of   difference is found with regard to issues of   subletting and sales. In a co-op, the board   has the right to review and approve both.    In a condominium, an owner can sublet   without board approval. An owner can   sell a unit without board approval as well,   though in most states the condo board   does have a right of first approval to act as   a substitute buyer.    The key takeaway here is that your   board is not your landlord, nor can you   as an owner do whatever you might want   at any particular moment. Overall, co-  op and condo living is a hybrid. Owners   should know their rights—but also their   responsibilities.      n  A.J. Sidransky is a staff writer for   CooperatorNews, and a published novelist. He   can be reached at alan@yrinc.com.   BOARDS, MANAGERS...  continued from page 2  the concept. “It’s not always as simple as it  shareholders and unit owners any contracts   looks,” he says. “A board member may want  between the board and interested individual   to be involved in a multimillion-dollar re-  quest for proposal (RFP). In the past, I have  not necessarily void or voidable solely be-  explained to clients   that that is not nec-  essarily a conflict;   there could just be   different interests at   play. In the end, it   might not be a con-  flict of interest, but   it still might not be   okay.”  What it re-  ally breaks down to,   says Brooks,  espe-  cially in a co-op or   condominium set-  ting, is who has the   necessary expertise.   “You need an en-  gineer,” he says. “If   the  board member   or the board mem-  ber’s cousin is an engineer, the question then  bers. The annual reports must be signed   becomes: Is he qualified?”  Brooks goes on to say that “this type of  transparency  and disclosure  around  these   situation is not automatically a problem—  if the board member discloses it, and if  self-dealing, but also goes a long way toward   the recommended person or entity fits the  maintaining an atmosphere of trust and ac-  bill for what the board is looking for.” This  countability between boards and the resi-  could pertain to a board member, a contact  dents they serve.   of  a board  member,  or  even a  division  or   subsidiary  of a  managing agent’s  firm  or   a brokerage company as well. “If a board   member is the best snow plow guy you can   get and the price is competitive, let him do   it,” says Brooks. “As long as it’s on the up-  and-up. If he charges a premium—well,   that’s a problem.”  Hakim agrees, adding that “sometimes   it’s not clear whether there is a conflict—or   even if the board member does in fact have   a financial stake in the matter. A contractor   performing work for the building who also   happens to be a distant relative of a board   member may not actually be a conflict,   provided the board member derives no   financial benefit.”  A Matter of Optics  While boards and their advisors should  \\\[for a project in a client community\\\]   definitely be on the alert for actual conflicts,  without disclosing that relationship to the   the pros also stress that even the appearance  community. Inside dealing always looks   or perception of conflict can be as toxic as  bad.   the real thing. Hakim says that while it may   be perfectly okay to hire a board member’s  often don’t understand that most outside   second cousin to re-tile the lobby if that  vendors will not bid on a $150 job. If no one   board member recuses him- or herself  else will do it, the management company will   from the decision-making process around  do it, but may not disclose it. For a board,   the  project,  “the  optics  often  do  not  play  the fact that they couldn’t find anyone else   well with concerned shareholders and unit  to do the job becomes secondary to the fact   owners—so we often suggest disclosing that  the manager didn’t disclose it. This often   relationship prior to a vote to approve the  happens with brokerage divisions as well.”  company.”   Hakim explains. “Under Section 727  eventually disclosed or discovered, can be   of New York Business Corporation Law  one of the biggest bones of contention be-  (BCL) amended in 2019, boards of direc-  tors of New York cooperative apartment   corporations and the boards of managers   of New York condominium associations are   required to annually review and disclose to   directors or managers. Such contracts are   cause a board member   has an interest in the   contract or participates   in the decision to en-  ter into it. Section 713   sets forth what infor-  mation about the con-  tract must be disclosed,   and the process that a   board must follow to   approve a contract with   an interested board   member, or to void the   contract under certain   circumstances. It fur-  ther requires boards   to disclose to owners if   the board has entered   into any contracts with   interested board mem-  by every board member.” A policy of full   contracts not only reduces the likelihood of   Truth or Consequences  In addition to being thrown off the board,   “if a board member breaches their fiduciary   duty, they can be sued for it,” says Brooks.   “You must disclose any potential conflict.   Don’t hide it—it will smell bad, and it will   eventually blow up in your face. Remember   that when everything looks good and there’s   a job well done, no one cares. It’s when it   goes the other way—and particularly when   there is already unrest in a community—  that it can be a political problem.”    Brooks says that conflicts can also become   an issue between boards and management   companies.  “It usually  happens when   a management company owns another   company that does, say, maintenance work,   and they refer the self-owned subsidiary   “Conversely,” Brooks continues, “boards    Undisclosed conflicts of interest, when   CONFLICTS OF...  continued from page 1  “Part of ownership   is realizing that   the association has   certain rules and   requirements, that   those rules apply to   you, and you must   abide by them.”         —Scott Wolf  continued on page 8   “Undisclosed   interests and   kickbacks will   certainly not sit well   with the building,   and are likely illegal   given the agency/  principal relationship   that exists.”         —Mark Hakim


































































































   4   5   6   7   8