Page 5 - CooperatorNews New York December 2021
P. 5

COOPERATORNEWS.COM  COOPERATORNEWS —  DECEMBER 2021    5  QUESTIONS & ANSWERS  Legal  Q  A&  Disturbing Neighbors  Q  I live in a condo where there   are quiet hours aft er 9 p.m., and   all disturbing noise, no matter   the time, can result in a fi ne. Two months   aft er I moved in, the downstairs neigh-  bor moved in, and it’s been a nightmare   ever since. Banging,  screaming, fi ghts,   rude guests  who  loiter  and  scream in   front of the building. Th  ree months aft er   he moved in, I fi nally complained to the   association, and they served the down-  stairs guy a cease and desist notice. Upon   receiving it, he came directly to me and   tried to smooth things over. It was shock-  ing. He fl at out admitted to being a drug   dealer, and off ered me illicit substances as   an olive branch. I didn’t have my phone to   record the convo, and wasn’t sure a record   of it could be used anyway, given that he   didn’t permit me to record it. At any rate,   since then the noise level has gotten worse   and worse. His live-in girlfriend screams   frequently, and I’m told (by him) that   she’s “hard to control when she’s drunk.”   Th  ey  have  extremely  loud  sex  at  1  a.m.   while I’m trying to sleep; just today while   on a work call, noise erupted from down-  stairs that could only be a psychotic epi-  sode from drug use, babbling sounds like   speaking in tongues, thrashing, banging.   I recorded the noise and sent it to man-  agement. Th  ey’ve told me over and over   again to contact the police, but the police   have told me they can only intervene if the   resident is disturbing the peace or if there   is a domestic disturbance. Th  is is one for   the books. Is anyone able to impart any   advice?                        —Shaken and Disturbed  A  “Living in a high-density   city like New York certain-  ly presents challenges to   people living peacefully with one another   when separated by thin walls, fl oors, or   ceilings,” says attorney Adam Finkelstein   of Manhattan law fi rm Kagan Lubic Lep-  per Finkelstein & Gold, LLP. “As such,   there is a level of disturbance that must be   accepted here that would not otherwise   be expected in less concentrated areas.   Day-to-day sounds during normal waking   hours are just a fact of life that do not af-  ford remedy, even though some may have   a heightened awareness of those noises   and are therefore more upset by such in-  trusions on their lives.     “Here, though, the letter-writer is de-  scribing sounds that appear to be beyond   the norm. In this regard, while overhear-  ing a conversation one aft ernoon through   a common wall between apartments, or   a person practicing their trombone at 8   p.m. every other day may be annoying, it   does not rise to a level of being actionable;   dealing with screaming, fi ghting, banging   on walls, and loud sex during what would   typically be deemed sleeping hours (aft er   11 p.m. and before 7 a.m.) does create a   potential claim for the aff ected neighbor.    “Th  e question though arises as to who   has the burden of bringing this situa-  tion under control. In a cooperative, the   responsibility could arguably fall on the   board, because in that context the coop-  erative is the landlord and therefore has   an obligation to provide habitable accom-  modations. If the noise level, timing, and   frequency impacts the ability of the aff ect-  ed person to use their own apartment, the   aff ected resident may be able to seek an   abatement and avoid paying maintenance   or a portion of the maintenance until the   situation is resolved. In this case, however,   the aff ected owner resides in a condomin-  ium. In a condominium there is no land-  lord-tenant relationship, and therefore no   warranty of habitability. Th  erefore there is   no obligation on the part of the board to   address a noise issue as a condition of re-  ceiving  monthly  common charges.  Like-  wise, while there may be condominium   rules—and even the power granted to the   board of managers under the bylaws to   take action or impose fi nes for conduct   that violates the rules—there is not usu-  ally a mandate that a board actually take   such action on behalf of the aff ected unit   owner, such action being discretionary by   the board.    “Th  erefore, if the  board  here  is  not   taking action with regard to these prob-  lems, the letter writer may be forced to   bring its own action for nuisance against   the off ending neighbor. An action for nui-  sance allows the aff ected owner to seek   damages that result from a neighbor’s ac-  tions on the neighbor’s property that are   (a)  substantial  in  nature,  (b)  intentional   in origin, (c) unreasonable in character,   (d)  interfere with a person’s right to use   and enjoy their property, and (e) caused   by another’s conduct in acting, or failing   to act. If the letter writer can prove these   elements, they would be able to seek dam-  ages for the adverse impact this conduct is   having on their use of their property.    “Of course, bringing an action for   nuisance will take time and cost money.   To the extent the letter writer is not pre-  pared  to  spend  either,  they  still  do  have   the recourse of seeking police interven-  From daily operations to crisis management,   the support you receive from your property   management company is invaluable. We   encourage condo and co-op board members   and multifamily rental building owners to   use this checklist to evaluate the services,   solutions and resources provided by your   management company and assess how   those offerings align with the unique goals   and expectations you have for your property.   Click or scan the QR code for access.  www.fsresidential.com/new-york  LetsTalk.NY@fsresidential.com  212.324.9944  Does your management   company check the boxes?   Making a Difference.  Every Day.  COMPANY    A  COMPANY    B  X  X  continued on page 13 


































































































   3   4   5   6   7