Page 9 - CooperatorNews July 2021
P. 9

COOPERATORNEWS.COM 
COOPERATORNEWS — 
JULY 2021   
9  
as asking prices realign and more buyers  
return to the city now that COVID-related  
restrictions are lifting.” 
In Boston, condominium sales are not  
only bouncing back—they’re breaking re- 
cords. According to the Greater Boston As- 
sociation of Realtors, this April, which saw  
a 60.3% increase in condo sales over last  
April, had a record-setting 1,220 units go  
into contract. Douglas Elliman Downtown  
Boston’s recent market report notes that  
Q1 2021 had the highest number of condo- 
minium sales in a first quarter since 2006.  
“The statistics are mind-boggling,” says  
Gene Hashkes, a realtor/broker at William  
Raveis in Newton, Massachusetts, “and I’ve  
been doing this for 25 years. With more  
people vaccinated, with us returning to  
work and back to life, you’re seeing a resur- 
HOW HAS COVID... 
continued from page 1 
gence in the condo market.” 
Additionally, thanks to historically low  
interest rates many first-time homebuyers  
may find that they’re now able to afford a  
city condo, while the numbers might not  
have worked a year or two ago. “This is an  
excellent opportunity to buy a condomini- 
um,” says Hashkes. “So, where you’ve seen  
[single-family] home prices appreciate over  
the last 12 months, condos have just been  
going up since the beginning of the year.” 
Gail Spreen, Senior Vice President of  
Sales for Jameson Sotheby’s in Chicago,  
foresees a recovery in the market there,  
too—not just as an end to the pandemic  
and its economic fallout, but as a shift from  
the uncertainty and tumult felt over the  
last year-plus in general. “I think it’s actu- 
ally a great time to be a buyer,” says Spreen,  
“because we’ve got great interest rates, our  
prices are down right now, and there’s a real  
positive energy.” She describes Chicago as  
feeling “electric,” with people getting back  
out in the great late spring weather, dining  
at restaurants, sitting outside, and going to  
the recently reopened Navy Pier. 
According to Spreen, the Chicago co- 
op and condo sales market did see some  
dips in pricing, but activity remains apace.  
Much of this can be attributed to the ease  
with which buyers, sellers, and agents have  
taken up—and mastered, in many cases— 
the technology available to them, including  
virtual open houses and property tours.  
“We still had a really decent selling season,”  
Spreen says, “even if our prices were down  
a bit, we still had people buying. And some  
had never even gotten in to see the condo  
before they actually closed on it.”  
Technology has changed the experi- 
ence of apartment hunting—and by most  
accounts, the changes are for the better.  
Tours are happening online, through photo  
and video sharing, or via teleconferencing.  
Buyers, says Spreen, can narrow down their  
searches at their realtor’s office or at home,  
saving in-person visits for properties in  
which they are truly interested. This makes  
the  process  easier  for  agents  as  well:  No  
more Sundays spent open-house-hopping.  
No more taking clients to see a unit they  
really have no intention of putting an offer  
on. Advance scheduling and limited walk- 
throughs makes things easier on buildings  
and associations, too. What began as an  
adaptation to dire circumstances definitely  
seems to be a trend with staying power.   
The Leaps 
Where Northern cities like New York,  
Chicago, and Boston saw a distinct out- 
ward migration of residents during the ear- 
ly days of the pandemic, cities in the South,  
with more access to open space and favor- 
able weather, experienced an influx—and  
in some cases, a veritable boom.  
For example, the Miami Realtors As- 
sociation reports that aside from a slight  
price dip in February 2021, South Florida  
has  been  one  of  the  hottest  markets  go- 
ing for the last year-plus. The migration of  
buyers from the Northeast and West Coast  
has fueled strong demand for homes there,  
says the Association, noting that between  
March and April of this year alone, condo  
prices rose by at least 20% for Broward and  
Miami-Dade counties.  
The year-over-year picture is even more  
remarkable. Between April 2020 and April  
2021,  the  total  number  of  condo  sales  in  
Broward grew by 126.9%; in Miami-Dade,  
that number is an astonishing 234.2%. Me- 
dian condo sales prices climbed in the two  
counties 19.9% and 23.0%, respectively.  
Florida Realtors points out that the  
pricing disparity can partly be attributed  
to using April as a comparison month— 
lockdowns  were  in  full  effect  in  April  of  
2020—but there is still a “severe shortage”  
of homes for sale compared to historic lev- 
els (as well as to high-inventory areas like  
New York City), which the organization  
says is the main contributor to these price  
surges. They also note that in parts of South  
Florida and Tampa Bay, 50%–60% of condo  
and townhome deals were all cash.  
While this is good news for sellers, buy- 
ers—particularly first-time homebuyers  
looking to finance their purchase—are fac- 
ing some unforeseen obstacles. “First-time  
buyers in particular are having trouble se- 
curing that first home for a multitude of  
reasons, including not enough affordable  
properties, competition with cash buyers,  
and properties leaving the market at such  
a rapid pace,” says Lawrence Yun, chief  
economist for the National Association of  
Realtors (NAR).  
The trajectory and longer-term implica- 
tions of this trend are uncertain. Yun sees  
the pandemic’s ebb as an impetus for “more  
inventory com[ing] to the market later this  
year as further COVID-19 vaccinations  
are administered and potential home sell- 
ers become more comfortable listing and  
showing their homes.” He also expects a  
falling number of homeowners in mort- 
gage forbearance to be an inventory driver. 
But Joel Kan, associate vice president of  
economic and industry forecasting at the  
Mortgage  Bankers  Association, says that  
data suggest that “in the short-term, inven- 
tory shortages will persist.” The ever-rising  
costs of labor and materials, plus a current  
labor shortage, are putting a proverbial  
wrench in new construction nationwide.  
Shrinking inventory isn’t the only prob- 
lem. While interest rates have reached  
historic lows in recent months, sparking  
some of the increased activity in the hous- 
ing market nationally, many real estate and  
financial professionals predict a change in  
this environment. Freddie Mac chief econ- 
omist Sam Khater sees it happening sooner  
rather than later. “Consumer inflation re- 
cently has accelerated at its fastest pace in  
more than 12 years and may lead to higher  
mortgage rates in the summer,” he says. 
The Grandes-Jetés 
Since the first COVID-19 vaccine in  
the United States was administered on De- 
continued on page 10  
affordable housing,” he says. “The Grinnell is  
a great example. It has both middle-class and  
working-class residents. It has worked re- 
ally well for both groups for many years. The  
crunch comes when the original rules govern- 
ing the economic status and requirements of  
residents expire. Will the residents make new  
rules and go to market rates, or will they con- 
tinue with their previous approach as a com- 
munity? The debates become fierce. Who are  
we to tell someone they can’t make a million  
dollars selling their apartment?” 
The more recent ‘80/20’ program sought to  
achieve economic integration on a more mi- 
cro level. The program set aside 20 percent of  
apartments in newly constructed luxury rent- 
al buildings for lower- and middle-income  
residents in exchange for tax benefits to the  
developers. The 80/20 rule has had mixed re- 
sults, coming under much scrutiny in the past  
decade—and perhaps even worse publicity.  
CooperatorNews 
 spoke with several lower- 
income families who live in 80/20 buildings  
and who prefer to remain anonymous to pre- 
serve their privacy. They say that while they  
have benefited from the opportunity to live  
in a state-of-the-art building at an affordable  
price, they have not found the environment  
to be welcoming. For one thing, they say that  
there is little social integration in these build- 
ings—the market-rate tenants and the lower- 
income tenants rarely mix, and in some cases,  
developers have made a point to physically  
separate the two demographics. The existence  
of two separate entrances for market- and  
reduced-rate residents, the latter colloquially  
known as “poor doors,” has been periodically  
called out in the press, and the very concept  
has left a bad taste in the public’s mouth. Some  
developers have also tried to limit the social  
impact of the inclusion of reduced-rate ten- 
ants by accepting only retired individuals on  
fixed incomes (as opposed to young singles  
and families), fulfilling the letter of the law,  
but not necessarily the spirit intended by the  
program concept to begin with. 
Snyder puts it bluntly: “No, 80/20 hasn’t  
been a successful model. It doesn’t provide  
enough affordable housing, and it’s also  
viewed as a wedge to drive people out of the  
neighborhood, like in big redevelopment  
deals such as the one proposed for Inwood in  
upper Manhattan just prior to the pandemic.”   
NOMICs 
One of the unintended consequences of  
the  housing  market’s  evolution  over  these  
past few decades is the emergence of natu- 
rally occurring mixed-income communities  
(NOMICs). These communities often result  
when longtime residents of a co-op or condo  
building age in place while younger, growing  
families move in. Because many older resi- 
dents live on fixed incomes and are therefore  
more impacted by even modest cost of living  
increases, and many younger residents see  
an expanding economic future and want to  
capitalize on improving and expanding the  
value of their apartments and the building  
as a whole, it’s not uncommon for friction to  
develop between the two demographics over  
how the community allocates its spending.  
Stuart Halper is vice president of Impact  
Management, a management firm with offic- 
es in New York City, Long Island, and West- 
chester. He manages over 100 buildings and  
says that  “often the conflict erupts between  
older and younger residents. The younger  
residents have more spendable cash, and want  
to do more in the building. Generally, it comes  
down to who steps up to be on the board, be- 
cause spending is a board decision. As prop- 
erties gentrify and neighborhoods change, a  
new wave of people may come in. The boards  
change, and a real balancing act comes into  
play. The moving targets may change. Which  
projects are needed, and how to pay for them?  
When you don’t want to do it by assessment,  
you can finance the projects through borrow- 
ing and disburse payback over a longer time  
period. That said, by law there is no exemp- 
tion for anyone from an assessment. There  
cannot be a two-tiered situation. There can be  
options to pay an assessment up front or over  
time, with an interest component—I’ve seen  
that done. It doesn’t happen often, but it helps  
older senior residents.” 
“In the end,” says Halper, “what happens is  
that those who can’t afford rising maintenance  
costs and assessments will sell their units.  
There are safety nets for short-term problems,  
but when it’s not affordable anymore, ulti- 
mately the people will sell.” 
So as it does on many other levels, eco- 
nomic integration in the context of multi- 
family housing remains elusive. Pros agree  
that some models of housing development  
and social engineering have been success- 
ful, and some haven’t.  Some are the result of  
natural forces—though that doesn’t necessar- 
ily make for a smoother process, or one that  
truly works for everyone. Success in the lon- 
ger term will likely depend on a combination  
of ingenuity, commitment, and sociopolitical  
will.   
n 
AJ Sidransky is a staff writer/reporter for Co- 
operatorNews, and a published author. 
   7   8   9   10   11